My Profile

Keep Up to Date:
Blog RSS
Blog
Forum RSS
Forum
Post New Topic Post Reply
Posted 2 Weeks, 4 Days ago
myprojeff
Gold Boarder
Posts: 165
graphgraph
User Offline
 
What is the difference between a 'captive' and 'prisoner of war'
The administrator has disabled public write access.
Posted 2 Weeks, 4 Days ago
hotelend
Expert Boarder
Posts: 146
graphgraph
User Offline
 
None that I know of. The two seem pretty synonymous. Captive sounds more primitive, while POW is a legal, western term, but that is just my 2 cents.

A confusion point that people often make (and this might apply here) is between an interned person and a POW. An enemy alien (such as a German businessman in America after Dec. 10, 1941) can be arrested and interned for the duration of the war as a potential threat. They aren't POWs, but are enemy aliens. I believe that they are protected by clauses in the prisoner conventions (Hague and/or Geneva). They are often exchanged through neutral nations. A prisoner of war, of course, is a member of the enemies armed forces who is captured. He is a military prisoner, and is kept in a military-run POW camp for the duration, and is protected by the Geneva and Hague conventions.
The administrator has disabled public write access.
Posted 2 Weeks, 3 Days ago
Sweety
Expert Boarder
Posts: 140
graphgraph
User Offline
 
Bud, I'm currently reading an interesting book on just this subject, 'A Prisoners Duty' by Robert C. Doyle (Naval Institute Press, 1997). My take on the distinction is that a prisioner of war is one who has been processed into his/her captives POW system as opposed to a captive is anything but.

Ken Weiler Sterling, Virginia
The administrator has disabled public write access.
 
Copyright © 2006 - Nov 2008 War History Fans