did hitler take drugs

someo me on this question!!!!!!


DID HITLER TAKE DRUGS OR WHAT HES DEMENTED IN THE HEAD!!!!!!???????????

From what i read in history books , no he did not take drugs,he was a teetotaler no drinking, no smoking and it appears no sex either some considered him to have been a neuter.

His personal physician dr Morell did administer a daily pep injection,in the later stages of the war ,when the setbacks started mounting heavily ,i suppose he needed that to try and keep his spirits up.

I personally think Hitler was a very spiritual individual, but when i say spiritual i mean wholly dedicated to his twisted ideas, the spirit having moved to the darker side of things,he taught the Germans how to hate! and view the world through his paronoid way of seeing things, there was defnitly a strong ascetic streak to his personality, for example on the Russian front he insisted to sleep in the most spartan of accomodations,in order to feel a solidarity with the common soldier in the field.He was perhaps the greatest example of how a fanatical mindset can act like a consciosness altering force.

Hitler had daily injections of methamphetamines, but he did condone smoking and drinking, until later in the war when the germans started loosing he began to drink to sleep, he was also a vegetarian.

HITLER WAS NOT MENTAL, OR INSANE, OR CRAZY!!! HE IS ONE OF THE BEST MILITARY LEADER IN HISTORY. HE SAW THROUGH THE LIES OF THE JEWS AND COMMUNISTS AND FIGHT AGAINST THE TAKE OVER OF JEWISH BOLSHEVISM! How can you do drugs and lead and army, fight a world war, and be the SAVIOR of Germany? Hmmmm?

Hitler's Fellower wrote:

HITLER WAS NOT MENTAL, OR INSANE, OR CRAZY!!! HE IS ONE OF THE BEST MILITARY LEADER IN HISTORY. HE SAW THROUGH THE LIES OF THE JEWS AND COMMUNISTS AND FIGHT AGAINST THE TAKE OVER OF JEWISH BOLSHEVISM! How can you do drugs and lead and army, fight a world war, and be the SAVIOR of Germany? Hmmmm?

Many people turn to drugs and alcohol to cope with daily pressure asserted on them, these people may not be war lords but they are an example of what can happen to the human under pressure.

In answer to Hitlers"Fellower",Hitler was a complete disaster as a military commander and we can thank him for playing a major part in the Western Allies defeat of one of the finest armies in history.

his decision to invade Russia before beating the Brits resulting in a two front war.

His ludicrous decisions such as deferring the conquest of Moscow,swinging Army group center across the path of A.G.S.,the battle of Stalingrad and the subsequent refusal to allow his forces to retreat(and believing Goering when he said that they could be supplied by air),his calling a halt to his panzers advance around Dunkirk thus allowing the B.E.F. to evacuate.

His belief that his panzers could act as a mobile "Fire Brigade" in Normandy in spite of Allied total air superiority.

The Battle of Kursk,The Battle of the Bulge,his trying to prevent the production of the assault rifle,his decision to use his new jet planes in the ground attack role instead of against allied bombers..........

The man was a complete and utter clown.

And as for your poorly spelled rant about sic"Jewish" Bolshevists,because of Hitler the Russians ended up occuping half of Europe for decades afterwards and post war were more powerful then they had ever been.

But of course you know this don't you,you being such a well informed and devoted follower of A.H.

ohhhhhh so many points to debate! I'm gonna drool!

Out of the line of your post, wich I totally agree with (Hitler was a disaster as a military leader) I'd have to argue about:

1- decision to stay and fight at Stalingrad. That I already spoke about in other thread. Probably the whole lot of Army group A and B, and Army group Don were saved by this decision.

2- Dunkirk: there was a natural reluctance to use panzers to finish off the pocket. The surroundins of Dunkirk are very tank unfriendly and the panzers were in not very good conditions after the attrition of the fast run towards the cost. At the time they were seen as indispensable for Case Red, and almost everyone betted that the fall of france would mean the end of the war, so he didn't risk them. It was a bad call, but I think that most military leaders of the time would've agreed with him. He had the backing of the OKW, for instance, in his decisions to stop the panzers.

3- Normandy was a dead end for the Germans. had the panzers stayed at the beaches they'd been wiped out by direct naval gunfire. Hitler had already given an order to stand in the beaches at Salerno and the HG division was almost wiped out of the map as soon as they approached the beaches during the counter attack. It was not a valid option, and he knew it.
The alternative was to use a movile strategic reserve, or a "fire brigade" as you call it. The problem is that there was no strategic movement chances for the german with all the french railway network destroyed, so they didn't help aswell.
but here it was a close end, one decision was bad and the other was as bad as the first. Hitler went with one and that was the bad choice...but the other wasn't any better, tbh.

4-the assault rifle decision...well, in his reasons Hitler had a point. The german industrial effort was already a mess, and to add another ammunition to produce on top, didn't look as a good prospect. The weapon itself didn't appeal a lot to him (or others,tbh)...previous tries to achieve a portable automatic rifle as a standard piece of soldier equipment werent successful (the last one was the FallschirmGewehr 42, and that wasn't exactly a success). All in all he was wrong in his opposition ,but at least had some seemingly (at the time) solid reasons to back up his stance.


5- the only reason there were so many 262 fighters so early in the air was because hitler pushed the program, no matter he wanted them as bombers. In fact the 262 fighter was in service BEFORE the 262 bomber, and it was in service the soonest it could've been no matter what. I once wrote a article about it backing up this opinion, but its in spanish and I should translate it. I'll eventually do it here

All the others, I agree with you

and to the topic...yes, hitler did take drugs. A lot of them. He had a personal doctor that daily injected him a cocktail of substances (mostly stimulants) that kept him able to work for almost all of the day and sleep very little (one of the few things to admire about Hitler, was the immense workload he succesfully assumed, his outstanding memory and his ability to remember things to the slightest of the details).

Of course all of that did come to a cost. He literally exhausted himself because of the "supplements" he got injected and because the unwordly ammount of work he did each day with so little sleep. his decay was visible even by 1943, and after the attempt at his life and failed coup of 1944 he degraded even quicker. Probably he owed his parkinson (his left hand had an uncontrolable shake by his last days) to this decay. Hitler was 57 at the time of his death, but he looked as an ederly of 70+.

But that had nothing to do with his "madness", his paranoia, or his hatred for the jews.

fuck you

suck my dick